ranting is good

I’m currently reading A Legacy of Ashes by Tom Weiner. He is talking about the history of the CIA in a novel like format – similar to how Bob Woodward write his books. In reading I was observing that the CIA, especially in its early years, would pay lots of money for “intelligence” that almost always turned out to be false. Based on that information the Director of Intelligence (and sometimes the President) would approve operations that ended up in a bunch of American CIA operatives getting killed. What was happening was that the Director was getting a bunch of wrong information and jumping to conclusions.

I was watching the news today about Hilary Clinton’s office in Rochester, NH getting held up by a guy with a bomb. First, the guy was a well-known local who had a history of mental problems. There were also a bunch of hostages. Then, there only three hostages and the all got out. Then there was one hostage left and the bomb guy was some kid’s step dad who has been drunk for 72 hours. Through the whole thing there would be three different news faces telling three different things that didn’t end up being the truth at all. That’s a very brief description of how the facts of the thing developed, but while I was watching it and noticing these changes I realized that the conclusions I had been led to only 10 minutes before were not right at all. Fortunately this was an example where the crisis was resolved in only a few hours. But when things go on and on for days or months, how much can we really believe what the news tells us. Well, we all know that we can’t really. But this is what we get and that’s fucked up.

MEDICARE – The political right uses the high cost of Medicare to explain why national healthcare is a bad idea. Government run stuff is inefficient. Lots of the pricing for Medicare benefits were based on 1980s market prices – so we still pay that much. Then, the issue is spun to make it look like people opposed to it are trying to “cut Medicare spending” so Democrats stay away from it, republicans alike. But at the same time the Republicans are the ones who want to cut costs. It is estimated that because of this pricing the government overpays for about 80 percent of Medicare recipients stuff. So the problem is not necessarily that government run Medicare is inefficient in its operation, but that it is priced so that it is inflated and looks like an inefficient program. It’s actually all really confusing and I didn’t to its complexity justice at all. But the point is that you should not believe a damn thing you hear. NOTHING!!